图片来源与许可 · 参考图使用许可未确认
AI 辅助插画 · 参考照片：本人、机构或原活动页面发布；摄影者未注明 · 参考图使用许可未确认 · 依据已核对姓名的来源页面图像，由 AI 绘制 B 细线彩铅头像；调整背景与肩部构图。展示图缩放至最长边 640 像素并转为 WebP。 · 参考图：Extended interview: Ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who warns AI could destroy humanity — Jacob Coxon
公开发言
3原话逐字核对过；转述不加引号核心问题在于是否有人造出了它，在于我们是否有监管确保每个人都在安全地构建它。单凭个人无法防范这种风险，必须由政府或专门机构来保护你免受他人行为带来的危害。
Basically what matters is whether anyone builds it. What matters is whether we have the regulation to ensure that everyone is building it safely. You can't protect yourself from this. It has to be the government or some body has to protect you from other people.
语境：回应记者关于‘公众是否应避免日常使用 AI 来规避风险’的提问，Coxon 强调先进 AI 带来的安全隐患具有绝对的负外部性，个体孤立的选择毫无意义，必须依靠公共监管防范系统性危机。
我非常希望看到的一件事，是 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 等实验室之间达成某种协议：在没有第三方透明审计和极其明确的安全论证之前，绝不推进到危险领域……因为现在我们还能做出不错的安全论证，但未来如果继续竞速，想要证明所做之事万无一失将会困难得多。
a very clear thing I'd like to see happen is some sort of agreement between labs like OpenAI and Anthropic not to push into dangerous territory without having third party transparent auditing, very clear auditing of their safety cases […] because right now we can make pretty decent cases, but in the future if we keep racing it'll be a lot harder to have completely watertight safety cases that what you're doing is safe
语境：针对前沿实验室间的恶性竞争，Coxon 呼吁 Anthropic 与 OpenAI 建立跨机构的安全承诺协议，将第三方透明审计置于能力突破之前。
世界正在发生如此剧烈的变化，一旦事情开始变得过于疯狂，除了放弃那种加速式的逐利使命之外，我们将别无选择。
there's no other choice but to abandon the accelerative profit seeking mission when things start going too crazy.
语境：讨论顶尖 AI 公司是否需要调整商业模式时，Coxon 提出前沿技术带来的社会与失控冲击一旦越过临界点，维持商业逐利竞赛的前提将被彻底颠覆。